Archive for the 'Review Revue' Category

Review Revue: Dead Kennedys - Bleed for Me

Thursday, July 2nd, 2009

deadkennedys

Hey everybody —

Happy almost-Fourth-of-July! It seems that with Independence Day being observed on a Friday, the whole week becomes a wash, so if you’re reading this from your place of work, I commend you on your dedication (well, sort of: what are you doing reading a blog when you should be working?).

Anyway, in honor of Our Great Nation’s Birthday, I thought it would be appropriate to share a record by one of the most patriotic, unabashedly America-Loving bands I could think of. Yes, that’s right: the Dead Kennedys. Why, they’ve even got a President’s name in their band name! And look, the cover of this record shows the fearless boys of the U.S. Army in action! (I think they’re probably dragging a mannequin to the Army Fashion Show.) Um… right?

All right, so maybe Jello and the boys aren’t exactly “love it or leave it” Toby Keith types, but you can’t say they’re not engaged citizens, unafraid to critique their government and exercise their First Amendment rights to the hilt. And what could be more American than that?

The single “Bleed for Me” was released in 1982, and its lyrics are a scathing indictment of U.S. foreign policy and its contribution to death squads and dirty wars across the globe. Having read up recently on U.S.-backed regimes in Argentina and the Dominican Republic, I can, sadly, vouch for the accuracy of this song’s harsh, terrifying lyrics. Without getting too preachy, here’s hoping that the habit of citizens to question our government’s actions is helping to move us in a more enlightened direction as a nation.

All right, enough of that: let’s all go drink some beer and watch stuff blow up!

“When are these guys going to put some content in their lyrics? All these songs about cars and girls are getting boring…”

“Now that the lyrics can be understood, these guys are very impressive.”

“These guys have always been impressive!”

“Yes, but not understandable.”

“YOU’RE NOT UNDERSTABLE [sic] EITHER!!”

“What’s Understable?”

“Please, if you aren’t going to comment on the record instead of the reviewers, don’t take up valuable writing space as M.F. and I have done. Thank you.”

“OBJECTION OVERRULED!!” [Ah yes, all capitals and multiple exclamation marks. What better way to get one's point across?]

“Guys. I bleed for you. And so does Jello. So stop your petty bickering, and start slamming! These are hot!”

“DEAD KENNEDYS WROTE THE BOOK ON U.S. PUNK!”

“Bullshit.”

Review Revue: Blake Babies - Sunburn

Thursday, June 25th, 2009

blake-babies

You know what’s weird? I grew up in Boston, and the years I was starting to get more into music from independent labels with electric guitars and such were the very years Blake Babies were most active around Boston. And yet… I never really listened to them. I heard their name all the time, and maybe heard a song here or there on WZBC or WHRB, and of course Juliana Hatfield ended up becoming more of a household name (at least in Boston), but for whatever reason Blake Babies were not a part of my collection. I’m listening to 1990’s Sunburn right now, and I probably would have dug it at the time: jangly guitars, earnest vocals, clever lyrics, just enough of an edge to feel somewhat “alternative.” Ah well, I guess it wasn’t to be. Luckily for the BBs, the music directors and DJs of college stations such as KCMU were paying more attention:

“Nice pop music with an edge. Very good lyrics on ‘I’m Not Your Mother.’”

“I never heard their much bally-hooed 1st LP. This is all pleasant enough sounding pop. A little in the vein of The Bats, though w/femal lead vocals and a little less delicacy. OK, but didn’t overwhelm me or anything.”

“Whether or not their first LP stank, their 2nd LP, Earwig, was GREAT (we have it on CD, too)… even if this softer sound doesn’t quite grab you, check out Earwig for a killer cover of ‘Loose.’”

“On second listen [this is by the same person who wrote the previous entry], I liked this as well as Earwig -- their lyrics are cutting, the guitarist is well versed in the art of blues chords and they still rock hard when they want to. ‘I’m Not Your Mother’ — HOT.”

And now, enjoy this oh-so-1990 video for the song “Out There”:

Review Revue: Pianosaurus - Groovy Neighborhood

Thursday, June 18th, 2009

pianosaurus

If you’re anything like me, you probably have a CD or two — or have recorded a CD or two — employing the use of the toy piano. There’s something about those tinny, slightly-out-of-tune little wonders that can add just the right light-hearted touch of melody to a song. So, yeah; toy pianos, been there, done that. But how about a whole band composed of toy instruments? If it’s been done in the past 20 years, I haven’t heard about it, but in 1987, Rounder Records released an album by a band from New York called Pianosaurus whose instrumentation was entirely of the toy variety, found in thrift stores and toy stores. And you know what? It’s pretty good! (And, for the record, not kid’s music — or at least not directed at kids.) I would go on, but the comments on this record are unusually informative and thorough, so I’ll just let the KCMU peops speak for themselves:

“Look closely at their instruments — these folks play only toy instruments. Toys — like what you might have had as a mere youth. The result — well, you’ll probably like it or loathe it. For me, it’s happy, hippy-ish youthful stuff. Reminiscent of John Sebastien + the Lovin’ Spoonful. I like it. I can’t belive that you can actually make recognizable music with toys. Check out ‘Memphis’ for instance. My favorites include ‘Ready to Rock,’ ‘Going Downtown,’ ‘Center of the Universe,’ ‘Toystore,’ + the John Lee Hooker song ‘Dimples.’”

“Gees, sometimes it sounds like they’re playing steel drums. Groovy Neighborhood was produced by Peter Holsapple of The dB’s. I’d put the concept of this record (toys) in H, but the record itself… ? Whaddaya say Mr. M.D., feeling adventurous, wanna lighten up the H bin? P.S. The Jazz Butcher’s earliest recordings (cassette) were with toy instruments. Hasil Adkins used a flat, cardboard guitar in his early days. Toys — a mark of musical integrity.”

“This is totally great; however, it will probably get old fast, so I recommend H for a short time, and then M, then L, then that little section behind L, then into the library.”

“Another good point.”

“Wow, what a concept.”

“Play this a lot. It’s about time somebody came up with this.”

“I saw this band in Boston. They are 10 times better live!! Toy music gods.”

“Fraggles! eek! Toy musicians rule the school!”

Fraggle Rock drum

Review Revue: The Young Gods - The Young Gods

Thursday, June 4th, 2009

young-gods

And here the orouboros that is Review Revue/college radio/independent music made by weirdos at last swallows its tail. About a year and a half ago, I posted this thorough dissection of the Young God EP by the band Swans. Released in 1984, this record was so influential that a couple years later one Swiss band decided to name their band after it, and went on to become quite influential in their own right (being name-checked by David Bowie, Mike Patton, The Edge, and others), and to continue to release records to the present day. I give you… The Young Gods, and their debut album, The Young Gods.

“This absolutely kills. Diamanda Galas’ brother on vocals with a barrage of noise dance bands creating the music. Not really, a trio that is amazing though. Right Kaiser?”

“The KAISER v. “The Young Gods.” What a combination. A real strong sound.”

“‘Did You Miss Me’ is an old Gary Glitter song…”

“Beware A-3 and A-4 segue together. [The preceding is scribbled out.] Scratch that.”

“Oh no, not more gods!”

“Well not quite [inserted next to this: "Check the name of the group, Phil."], but a ‘veritable smorgasbord of noisy stuff. ['stuff' is circled, with the note 'Death to all who use this horrible word.'] On Mute, but in the Wax Trax catalog (?)”

“But is it good?”

“More pose, than substance. Back to the Batcave!”

“Mom! Dave’s making fun of me again!”

“Whine to your God, not your mom!”

Review Revue: Bitch Magnet - Ben Hur

Thursday, May 28th, 2009

Bitch Magnet

OK, I’ll admit it — there’s not a huge amount of commentary on the cover of this fine, fine slab of vinyl. But Bitch Magnet’s Ben Hur – along with Slint’s Spiderland — is a classic, a founding document of post-rock, if you will, and I had to take this moment to shed a little light on an underappreciated gem. Let’s see if the KCMU posse agree with me, shall we? And hey, why not listen along while you read?

“I love Bitch Magnet! This has really grown on me.”

“More great guitar work and hardly any vocals. A little disappointing, though — it lacks the intensity of Umber. But still plenty good, especially the slow, smoldering tracks (1.2, 1.3, 2.2 and 2.4).”

“I agree with Todd. Good, but it should be great. Excellent cover shot, tho.”

“I wanna take this home. I think I hear something going on underneath the murk.”

Review Revue: Elvis Costello & the Attractions - Goodbye Cruel World

Thursday, May 21st, 2009

elvis-costello

Yes, yes, we all love to delve into those obscure bands that twelve people knew about when they were around and now nobody remembers, but sometimes it’s fun to check in with an old favorite - a legend, even. It is in that spirit that this week I bring you 1984’s Goodbye Cruel World, the eighth album by Elvis Costello & the Attractions (and Elvis’s ninth album overall). While it seems many Elvis purists regard this as one of his worst albums, it holds a special place in my heart, as I vividly remember sitting in front of the TV watching Elvis and Daryl Hall in the video for “The Only Flame in Town” (as well as “Everyday I Write the Book,” from the previous album Punch the Clock). Ahhhh, memories. Anyway, it seems that even the super-cool-dudes at KCMU had room in their hearts for this oddball of an album:

“Elvis takes the change of direction he began on Punch the Clock one step further, reveling in subtlety, with soft musical touches & lyrical twists. ‘Peace in our Time’ was originally released as an import 45, under the name of the ‘Imposter.’ OH! Daryl Hall is on ‘The Only Flame in Town.’”

“Elvis is king!”

“This guy speaks truth.”

“This is fucking awesome. For rockers, try ‘Sour Milk-Cow Blues’ or ‘The Deportees Club.’ Yow! PS — Where’s Steve Nieve? Huh?” [Keyboardist Steve Nieve is on this album, he's just credited as "Maurice Worm" -- that's him on the keys in the video.]

“‘Green’ from Scritti Politti sings on ‘I Wanna Be Loved.’”

“Elvis certainly is King, and has been ever since he first recorded “Hound Dog” back in the fifties. Why you chose to make that comment on this album is something we can only wonder about.”

“I can only wonder about you, Neil…”

“How come EC always surprises you every album?”

“Damn nice.”

“In answer to JS’s question: Because E.C. is a true artist.”

Review Revue: Smersh - The Part of the Animal That People Don’t Like

Thursday, May 14th, 2009

smersh

Like any good radio station, we here at Review Revue love to take requests. So when reader Damon Creed (who comments on these blog posts occasionally, but whose comments as a KCMU DJ are featured on a large proportion of the records I pull out for the blog) suggested I look into the output of the band Smersh, I was very happy to comply. I ended up picking this album, 1987’s The Part of the Animal That People Don’t Like, due its high volume of comments (and the lovely ballpoint-pen art of the first comment) — three of which, it turns out, are by Mr. Creed himself.

I don’t know much about Smersh, and their recorded output is hard to find in print these days, but if you look hard enough you can find all sorts of information (and full albums!) about them online. If you’re interested in things Smershy, this video interview from 1988 is probably well worth your time.

“FUCKIN HEAVY”

“Trance inducing electro-beat-industro-stuff from New Jersey. I like ‘em, these sounds.”

“Lots of influences but plenty of imagination, too.”

“Runs roughshod over your face, don’t it?”

“Finally, something more on the bizarre side. (In ‘H’ please.)”

“Brings ya back to your primal caveperson days (mating urges). This record is GRREAT.”

“This has some real bite to it. Really good.”

“Smersh were the bad guys in Ian Fleming’s J.B. Novels before Spectre came on the scene. - The Trivia King” [It seems, or at least Wikipedia claims, that SMERSH was an actual Soviet intelligence agency, as well.]

“I keep thinking of Smurfs. But that’s [illegible], isn’t it? Like Slap. Like Severed Heads and other heavy-handed dance stomps. I’ll jump on the bandwagon.”

“Sounds like the microphones had gauze on ‘em when this was recorded.”

Review Revue: NoMeansNo - 0 + 2 = 1

Thursday, April 30th, 2009

nomeansno

Happy Thursday! It is time for some regional punk rock, courtesy our neighbors to the north, NoMeansNo. Formed in 1979 (!) in British Columbia by brothers John and Rob Wright, they continue to rock their dedicated fans in the US, Canada and Europe to this very day. NoMeansNo means business! This week’s Review Revue selection, 1991’s 0 + 2 = 1, is pretty much smack in the middle of their oeuvre. Unlike many bands making loud guitar music in the 1990s, the brothers Wright never signed to a major label, maintaining a relationship with Jello Biafra’s Alternative Tentacles (which also started in 1979) into the early 00s. These days they’re releasing their records on their very own imprint Wrong Records.

“Yeah, brilliantly played, intelligent, loud + tight + I don’t like it. The songs have no momentum — the beats too stacatto + a tad sterile. The ones most to my liking are 1-5+ 2-6. Someone else needs to check this out. (And yes, about 60% of their last show bored me shitless, 40% ruled the universe.)”

“A really cool album. Play up! Don’t listen to Mark, he’s a nerdy scientist. Iverson knows what’s up. Play play play!”

“Not yet, Darren!”

“Oops! — you’re talking ’bout the other Mark.”

“Tight, powerful, cynical, and brilliant. Could be their best yet. Incredible songwriting (esp. 1-2). Some lyrics seem demented, but they’re always interesting. Sounds like they’ve been reading kafka. God, this is great!”

“‘Now’ sounds like Marianne Faithfull! No kidding! I wonder if she’s hip enough to cover it?”

“Yeah, first time I heard it I thought it had a female vocalist.”

“‘I Think You Know’ is pretty quirky. OK.”

“‘I’m sick with this,’ to quote Humpty Hump.”

“They’re from Victoria, not Vancouver.”

“I like everything I’ve heard so far, especially 1-1 & 1-2.”

“I agree essentially w/Maahk the nerdy scientist.”

“Didn’t slay me immediately like Wrong did, but this has really grown on me. ‘Now’ is a real departure for a band that’s always been pretty eclectic to begin with.”

“‘Now’ is one great song.”

Review Revue: The Stone Roses - The Stone Roses

Thursday, April 23rd, 2009

stoneroses

OK, people, we’re going to take a stroll down memory lane here…

When I was a much younger person, I went to a summer camp in Maine. Very often we would have camp counselors from the UK. I’m not sure why; maybe some kind of exchange or something? Anyway, these counselors were always exponentially cooler than us, first because they were older, of course, but then on top of that, they were from England, which is just incredibly cool. One that I remember in particular was even from Manchester! How cool is that?

Of course, being from Manchester, she turned me on to some pretty awesome music that I’d never heard of: Joy Division, The Charlatans UK, and this week’s feature, The Stone Roses. Their drugged-out blend of psychedelia and jangly brit-pop was apparently exactly what my 13-year-old self needed to get through adolescence (along with a healthy dose of DC post-punk courtesy Dischord, of course). Apparently the KCMU heads were digging the Stone Roses at the same time; maybe they would’ve made good camp counselors too?

“Likable pop.”

“1-5 is a nice bit of semi-instrumental psychedelia — great for late night programming.”

“Working in a guitar-pop vein akin to the Wonder Stuff, but w/less obvious hooks. Curiously (and also like the Wonder Stuff), they remind me of the old Pure Joy in spots. 1-2 & 1-3 are already in our library. Also good are 1-4, 2-2, 2-6. A nice twist on jangle plus undertones of club/dance music.”

“Quite enjoyable. Just when you’re starting to think that they’re just another cute Brit pop band, they’ll kick into a funky, psychedelic jam like on ‘Waterfall.’ Check it out!”

“I like this too!”

“POT HIGH.” [No, this has nothing to do with the drugs the band might or might not have been taking when they recorded this album; it just means it's mastered relatively quietly, so the DJ will have to adjust the volume a bit when they play it back. Sort of like the "soundcheck" feature on iTunes, only it actually works.]

“‘Waterfall’ is nice.”

“On CD too!”

Review Revue: The Walkabouts - See Beautiful Rattlesnake Gardens

Thursday, April 16th, 2009

walkabouts

It seems like every week here on Review Revue I’m saying how old a band or record is, and how crazy that is, so apologies if I’m starting to sound like a broken record (ha!), but… this year marks 25 years since The Walkabouts became a band. Isn’t that crazy? They started here in our fair city in 1984, and 25 years, several personnel changes, and well over a dozen albums later, they are still going strong (even, perhaps, a bit stronger now that Walkabout Terri Moeller’s other band Transmissionary Six has called it quits and her bandmate Paul Austin has joined the Walkabouts fray).

See Beautiful Rattlesnake Gardens was the band’s first full length record - and in a nice little connection to our installment a couple weeks ago, it was released by PopLlama Records, who have also been home to the Posies. They’d already been playing around for a few years, and had released a couple EPs, so doubtless this wasn’t the first exposure the KCMU DJs had had to the band. Let’s see what they had to say, shall we?

“Another facet of the Seattle Club Sound. This is quite a nice album. some of the tracks are significantly stronger than others. You find them, OK? Cover done by that nice gent, Ben Thompson.”

“A lot better than I expected.”

“H, please!”

“A nice album. My work prevents me from commenting further.”

“H, yes! Check out ‘Breakneck.’”

“Superb. Walkabouts have made an inconspicuous [illegible]… ta-da!”

“I like the Walkabouts but I’m surprised by how fast I got bored of this album.”

“The Walkabouts tend to play the darker more cryptic side of folk-rock dirge stuff. New album someday soon. Much better than the last one!”